The World…As I See It: Lent (In the Spirit of the Recession)

I have a problem.  It’s official.  Well, it’s actually been official for quite some time.  I don’t know how to not buy things.  8 summer skirts. What’s another?  But I don’t have that EXACT shade of eye shadow. I really don’t like the other 4 black dresses I already have.  I won’t spend X amount on 1 thing but on 3 or 4 isn’t so bad (even though I don’t need 2 of them). My name is Jo’van and I have a shopping problem.

Today is the beginning of Lent.  While I am not an overly religious person, I grew up in the church and certain things stick with me.  If I didn’t work every day of the week, I would have tried to find a church home here.  But alas, bills are constantly calling and Sunday is a well paying day.  In addition to praying before eating, thanking God for the life I get to enjoy every day and saying bless you when someone sneezes, I work to observe Lent. (Yes, there are other much more important things that I could be doing but I’m just being honest.)

Lent is a limited New Year’s resolution for Christians.  You only have to give up something for a month and half and you get to pick.  Now, it should be something you abuse, a vice of sorts but you can pick whatever you want. Know you should stop drinking 4 Diet Cokes a day?  Okay, wait until Lent, try it, cheat, and pray for forgiveness.  Need to exercise more often?  Try if for 40 days and give up.  Have a shopping problem like me?  Hide that credit card for a little more than a billing period.  In the spirit of the recession, I’m giving up creating more unecessary debt (or limiting paying off my existing debt).

Last year, I gave up buying music.  It was very difficult.  (I kind of cheated but it’s not my fault.  Ok, it was.  I went to a concert and loved this opening band I’d never heard of, Mute Math.  I simply suggested that my roommate, who agreed they were good, buy their CD.  If she decided she no longer wanted it – after uploading it to iTunes -, I would buy it from her after Lent 🙂 ).  This year, I’ve decided to give up shopping altogether.  Aside from groceries and toiletries, I don’t NEED anything else.  I’d LOVE new shoes, pants, socks, lipgloss whatever.  But I can survive without them.  In fact, I can more than survive.  I can look good without them.

It’s time to reevaluate my closest.  What haven’t I worn in a while?  What have I NEVER worn? It’s really sad how much I have and don’t need.  Every few months I take bags to Buffalo Exchange and Goodwill.  But it never amazes me how the bags seem to refill.  Where do these shoes, purses, dresses, pants and anything else come from? Oh yes, Ross, Penney’s, Kohls, Theory, New York and Co.  Again, I have a problem.

Giving up shopping for Lent is not going to fix anything but it should help.  But maybe I can make it a habit.

Shopping in her closet,

Jo’van

The World…As I See It: Double-Standards for Chris Brown

Let me start by saying that I do not condone any form of assault, men on women, women on men, same sex, black on black, adults on children, whatever.  With that said, I must also say that I think it’s interesting how quickly and severely “the world” has turned against Chris Brown.

While I believe he deserves whatever he gets IF the allegations are true, I must wonder (out loud) what makes Chris Brown’s case any different than the handful of celebrity assault cases brought to media attention every year.  (Since the majority are men against women, I’ll continue discussing it that way.  However, I do realize women can be just as abusive.)

Did Rihanna suffer any more than the spouses of Stone Cold Steve Austin or Jason Kidd or Scott Weiland or even James Brown? No. Hmmm, I wonder.  While these celebrities may have had some bad press, this case – less than a week old – hasn’t even been completely worked out but Chris Brown is already being punished more than any of these guys. Again, IF he did it, he deserves it.  But why didn’t any of the other celebrities in the past?

It must be because their wives/girlfriends were not ALSO celebrities.  Chris Brown is in special trouble because people know and love Rihanna.  No one should ever raise their hand to a woman but to even raise your voice at Princess Ri Ri is obviously a much larger offense.

I don’t want to sound unsympathetic.  I hope she is able to heal, never questions her self-worth, never believes she deserved it and moves on to a more deserving man. But I still keep going back to Chris.  I’m not sorry for anything he’s going through.  I just wish everyone else, especially celebrities, would be held to the same standards.  Get dropped immediately from your endorsements, appearances and the radio.

I hope everyone concerned can tend to their needs and move on.  Let us all just remember this the next time an NBA player beats his playboy model girlfriend.  I feel bad for Rihanna but this case makes me feel worse for the ignored beaten wives and girlfriends of other celebrities and regular people.  Chris should be held accountable and Rihanna should be able to heal.  But we must remember she’s no more important than the women scared for their lives in your local shelter.  They deserve our same level of support and their assailants deserve our same level of outrage.

Shaking her head,

Jo’van

Shades of Understanding: 8 of Top 10 Most Influential Celebrities are African-American

An interesting study was announced this week.  According to the Davie Brown Index, 8 of the top 10 “marketable” celebrities are African-American. Surprisingly, only numbers 2 and 6 are Caucasian.  President Obama usurped Tom Hanks this year.  In descending order:

  1. Barack Obama
  2. Tom Hanks
  3. Will Smith
  4. Michael Jordan
  5. Morgan Freeman (I LOVE him! 🙂 )
  6. George Clooney
  7. Denzel Washington
  8. Michelle Obama
  9. Oprah Winfrey
  10. Tiger Woods

In this case, marketable doesn’t mean the best product-hawking endorsement but “a celebrity’s ability to influence brand affinity and consumer intent.”  Basically, the study is about celebrities people trust.  Who do you want to listen to?  Whose shampoo would you use? Whose blood pressure medication would you talk to your doctor about?

The DBI is a tool for agencies and companies to know which celebrities would best fit their product communication goals. “The DBI includes more than 1,500 celebrities that are each evaluated by 1,000 consumers. These evaluations are the results of a panel made up of 4.5 million consumers.”  Respondents who are aware of a certain celebrity are then asked a standard set of questions about that celebrity. Using a six-point scale, eight key attributes are evaluated, including appeal, notice, trendsetter, influence, trust, endorsement, breakthough and aspiration.

President Obama ranked 1st in four categories (trust, influence, trendsetter, breakthrough) and 2nd to Bill Gates in one category (aspirational).  He finsihed 5th in [product] endorsement.

I think it’s interesting that African-Americans rank so highly in this “celebrity respect” study.  While I completely understand the selection of these individuals, the percentage just seems odd.  White, black, brown or the other, who do you think is missing from this list?

Strangely proud,

Jo’van

Office Appropriate: Work-Life Social Media Balance

I am an old school person.  And by old school, I mean someone who grew up in the 90s.  I expect to work on a computer and still enjoy reading a physical magazine.  A movie version will never replace a good book (except for when it was for a senior english paper you procrastinated to write).  My iTunes library is large but I still like to purchase the CD.  A true ballader is Brian McKnight, not Usher.  Destiny’s Child never lived up to En Vogue’s precedent (who probably never lived up to the Supremes).  But I digress.  The point is I grew up learning to live digitally, not expecting it.  With only a 6 year difference, it’s amazing to me just how much more connected my younger siblings are (and I’m only 24!).

I was the first generation of Facebook.  While MySpace and Black Planet (haha) were already around, Facebook was unique because it was connected to your university/college.  You could only create a profile with a school email address.  It seemed safer, more exclusive.  And purely for fun.  You found your friends (not colleagues), posted photos of drunken nights (not corporate mixers although they can be the same), and wrote the most ridiculous things you could think of on their walls (not browsed for new marketing ideas).

I work in an industry that is embracing social media on a corporate level.  I get it.  New ways to connect with the customer.  Get in their face ANYWAY you can.  I agree it can be an effective business model.  However, I’m not THAT kind of customer.  I want my social media to remain social.  I want to browse my friends’ profiles, not those of companies trying to get my money.  It somewhat ruins the experience for me when I spend hours of billable time browsing these sites.  Why would I want to get on Facebook after work?

Bosses, colleagues, interns and college students I never interviewed are requesting to be my friend.  What do I do?  Is it rude not to accept?  What about relegating them to a “limited” profile?  Does that send a bad sign?  There’s nothing in my profiles that would embarrass me if any of these people saw it.  But at the same time, I don’t really want them to see my photos on the beach in college or last year’s Foxy Brown Halloween costume.  We’re not close enough for me to want to share.

(I know potential full-time employees, interns AND collegiate athletes whose profiles have gotten them into trouble.  It’s not worth it.  If you must post, please realize WHAT you’re posting and WHO can see it. )

Facebook is for connecting with friends.

MySpace is for discovering new bands.

Twitter is for sharing your random thoughts when you’re too lazy to update your MySpace and Facebook statuses.

Blogs are for sharing your opinion.

Yes, companies should be able to reach their customers anywhere their customers can be found.  But MY social media is destined to remain social.  Unless you know my middle name, have been invited to my apartment, had a conversation about more than your resume or have talked to me about more than next week’s assignment, don’t expect to be considered an unfiltered friend.  If it hurts your feelings, I’m sorry for you.  I may help companies become more social, I have no intention of towing the work-life social media line any more than I have to.

Updating her limited profile list,

Jo’van

  • February 2009
    S M T W T F S
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
  • Archives

  • Follow The Truth: According to Jo'van on WordPress.com
  • Enter your email address to follow Jo'van and receive her updates.